Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture represents a differentiation in structural design of a health care center with the year 2005 and the present state.
Overall, what stands out from the picture is that the formation of the health center area has changed both inside and outside. Clearly, for the facilities of people, the layout is being made enlarge.
According to the picture, in 2005, the entrance was on the south side and in the middle of the building, while at present, it is rebuilt on the south-east of the building. Moreover, there were no children playing areas in the previous state, but now in addition to the playing area, the reception desk is replaced close to the entrance gate. Furthermore, for minor operations, a room is established just next to the physiotherapy room.
In addition, on the outside of the building, the place for car parking is enhanced and now more 18 cars can be parked on that space. The fences also realign to protect the garden. The center of the building is changed, the center is shaped like a square and the consulting room is arranged sequentially, in addition, the number of the consulting room is upgraded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | Delime | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Tuệ Nguyễn | 58 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | Awadhesh Mourya | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | Sanaullah97 | 11 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 78
- The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below 78
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85641025641 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76512516168 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.146221683 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0539505681853 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207524147597 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292607204854 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0384183758475 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303414653904 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.