the charts below show the information about land use in four countries
The pie chart illustrates the comparison between four countries: Portugal, New Zealand, Canada, and Norway, in terms of the statistics of land use for three different categories: Arable land, pasture land, non-agricultural land. Overall, it is clear that most of the land in these countries is non-agriculture. Also, except for New Zealand, the arable land in other countries is larger than the pasture land.
To begin with, the data indicates that land use by non-agricultural accounts for 96% and 93% in Norway and Canada, respectively. Portugal followed with 57%, and finally New Zealand with 51%. By contrast, the percentage of pasture land in New Zealand is the highest, at approximately 50%. It can be noticeable that New Zealand's land use for non-agricultural purposes is nearly equal to the pasture sector.
Meanwhile, land use for arable purposes is just 10% in each of the three countries, namely Canada, Norway, and New Zealand, with Canada at 2% and Norway at 1%. While 34% of the total land is used for arable purposes in Portugal, the proportion of this purpose in New Zealand is equal to Norway's, at about 1%.
- The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods wheat maize rice by people in four different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries traditional food is being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 84
- Social people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is nearly equal to the pasture sector. Meanwhile, land use for arable purposes ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while, except for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03191489362 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02646019216 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5202361053 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219326459167 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108728194074 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650547705069 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163647722225 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768774649225 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.