Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you thin the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
In this modern era, museums hold and represent the history of times to the next world. People of all generations can garner knowledge about their ancestors and the ways they lived in. These houses of history and culture need funding which is usually maintained by private organizations or, responsible governments. A few museums offer its visitor free access; however, numerous numbers charge a fee on the visit. Although the charges on visiting could cause visitors to be apathetic about museums, fees are indispensable for the maintenance and flourishment of museums' resources, and I mostly believe charging on admission into museums is saving the museums as well as our history.
People these days are extremely insightful about ancient lifestyle and cultures, and exploring museums are one of the richest resources to study them. Many researchers are working on a various expeditions to find many artifacts and resources of pre-historic times and, these expeditions require findings that are usually sponsored by different museum authorities. On top of that, security is a vital question; It has been seen in previous times in Egypt, Italy that many museums had lost their resources. Moreover, most of the artifacts require proper maintenance. All these activities require fundings to corporate and in this case, admission from the visitors can fulfill a vast portion of these requirements, which is salutary to preserve the houses of history for the people.
Mind you, a few museums do not ask for any fees from their visitors. Most of these are either government-funded or perhaps well-established foundations. But, government fundings have come from people; so, visitors are already paid for this. Perhaps a free visit can attract people to while way in the museums; however, it is not lucrative for any privately funded authorians. A report shows a decrease numbers of museums in the UK because they sold all their artifacts to other museums as they cannot bear the expenses.
It could be true, because of the higher admission charges, a few people lose their interest in exploring and studying history in the museums, but we need to admit that people are getting many facilities in the museums than before. Environments are much delicate and learning becomes more standard resources become rich. I mostly believe these are factors that every visitors expect, and every penny will be worth it if authority ensures these.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
... Although the charges on visiting could causes visitiors too being apathetic about mus...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...or the people. Mind you, a few museums dont ask for any fees from its visitors. Mos...
^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'attract'
Suggestion: attract
...paid for this. Perhaps a free visit can attracts people to while way in the meusums; how...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...heir artifacts to other museums as they cant bear the expenses. It could be true, b...
^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...e need to admit that people are getting much facilities in the museums than before. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, mind you, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20930232558 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73895714427 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5319449467 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293062761861 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788822418331 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767949859933 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173564933794 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736048571503 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.