Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion?
Sentiments diverge on whether the school should categorize students based on similar abilities instead of respective skills. Although this stance can be justified to some extent, I am at loggerheads owing to certain rational reasons.
Admittedly, distributing the students whose talents are the same in one class has its teaching advantages. There is no academic gap between these students whose abilities are equal, so this category can create a balanced studying atmosphere. For instance, the government in Vietnam has founded a variety of gifted schools, as a result, the number of well-educated learners in classes has surged dramatically. Furthermore, these people who share the capacity can push each other to study. All members have to study in earnest in order not to be left behind or higher promotion, then create better learning outcomes.
On the other hand, mixed-ability grouping provides many benefits, especially in interpersonal communications. With a wide range of skills, students in one class can easily discuss a lesson with each other from separated perspectives, so that their knowledge can be concreted properly. Therefore, the lesson can be clarified clearly and bear in their mind. Further and more importantly, in the symbiotic studying environment, students are flexible in teamwork, they will utilize their source of knowledge to boost working productivity. There was a survey conducted in Vietnam about the winning rate in competitions between the mixed-ability schools and one-skill schools. Surprisingly, the result indicated the overwhelming triumph of school which possesses students with a variety of abilities to the opposite.
By way of conclusion, each type of school have its own advantages; however, categorizing students with different skills in a school is more rational
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 67
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 83
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and above in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one class', 'a class', or simply 'class'?
Suggestion: one class; a class; class
...ith a wide range of skills, students in one class can easily discuss a lesson with each o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59057971014 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13707653913 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3896674798 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266107230843 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845902386301 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504607234413 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155959910726 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214736481741 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.