The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001.
The pictures illustrate many alterations in Felixstone in the UK from 1967 to 2001
Overall, over a 34-year period, many shifts were taken place mainly for tourism as the addition of more accommodation and beaches. In addition, significantly farmland, fish market, pier and marina were demolished to make way for new facilities
In 1967, there were two lines of shops situated between a golf course and the farmland, which were divided by High street. To the southern part, a fish market was located opposite the farmland and in the northeast of a marina and a pier. On the west side of the map, dunes formed in the middle of a greenery area and a hotel- adjacent to a café. And there was the sea at the end of the map which still stayed the same till 2001
In 2001, remarkably farmland was removed to make way for a new area which consisted of a hotel to the right, a swimming pool to the left, together being opposite tennis courts. Moreover, the right line of shops was replaced by apartments and beaches were constructed and separated into public and private sectors, replacing the fish market, marina and pier. A new car park was also added right in the west of the old hotel and wind turbines were placed opposite the dunes. Eventually, other infrastructures remained intact
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- In many western countries there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children What are the advantages and disadvantages to couples having no children 78
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 55
- The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74666666667 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61499569199 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8909865433 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925645855752 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333023933707 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050452952668 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095202360892 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114695935915 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.