For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some believe teachers are more important than parents in children's intellectual and social development, while others disagree. I disagree that parents have less influence on their children's social and cognitive development than teachers.
In the first place, parents brought their children into the world and spend a lot of time with them; as a result, parents know exactly what level of intelligence their children have. Understanding a child's preferences allows parents to devote more time and resources toward helping the child become more educated in that specific area. As a result of this knowledge, parents are able to place their child in an environment where he or she will be able to develop social communication skills. For example, everyone knows that scientist Thomas Edison was expelled from school as a child because his teachers underestimated him, but thanks to his mother's proper upbringing with Edison, he became a genius of the century. The meals are a further reason. In order to feed their children a healthy and well-balanced diet, parents plan the menus for their meals. For example, children today are smarter and healthier because their parents' nutritional knowledge has improved over the years.
The positive impact of teachers on students' intellectual and social skills, on the other hand, cannot be argued with. To make children smarter, teachers receive specialized training in how to instruct them and can assist them in honing their communicative capabilities. If students participate in group exercises assigned by teachers, these skills are reinforced for them. As a result of their continuing role as teachers and knowledge transmitters, parents are critical in helping their children develop important interpersonal and communication skills throughout life.
To summarize, parents have a greater impact on their children's ability to become intelligent and competent than teachers do. However, both parties must work together for the benefit of children's holistic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 73
- More and more people are seriously overweight Some people suggest the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that offenders should be put in prison Others however believe that providing offenders with education and training is more effective than putting them in prison Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52750809061 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93359582027 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57928802589 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4656891391 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517958052909 0.244688304435 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175387482867 0.084324248473 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134155529611 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335847344633 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703311561181 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52750809061 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93359582027 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57928802589 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4656891391 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517958052909 0.244688304435 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175387482867 0.084324248473 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134155529611 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335847344633 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703311561181 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.