Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that students who study abroad will bring numerous advantages to their countries. However, I partly agree that having students studying abroad is useful for countries.
On the one hand, I agree that when students study oversea, their countries can substantially benefit. Firstly, international students can deploy the advanced knowledge they gained from other countries to develop their home countries overall. Specifically, they apply it suitably into the contexts of their countries to improve their countries in various fields, especially science and technology. For example, in Vietnam, lots of students, after accomplishing tertiary education abroad, come back and contribute significantly to their motherlands in terms of economy and education. Secondly, international students play a crucial role in promoting their countries’ images. In fact, several students who are currently pursuing higher education oversea are influencers on some social media platforms. Therefore, their countries’ cultures are promoted and become widely known in the countries they are learning in.
On the other hand, brain drain is a major concern. Nowadays, many students choose to pursue their careers in developed countries instead of going back to their home countries. This may be because they are of the opinion that their motherlands cannot offer as many opportunities to move up the career ladder as the developed ones. For example, in Vietnam, after winning the Olympia contest and be offered scholarships to study abroad , only 3 over 18 winners came back to build their careers. As a result, some countries would lose talented students who are probably be able to boost the countries’ development faster.
In conclusion, I would argue that governments should adopt some policies to attract students to return to their countries after completing their education abroad.
- The maps give information about a university sports court 81
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go to full time work after leaving college in 2008
- Topic The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- Topic The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... be offered scholarships to study abroad , only 3 over 18 winners came back to bui...
^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sult, some countries would lose talented students who are probably be able to boo...
^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ose talented students who are probably be able to boost the countries’ developmen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6350877193 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93533915449 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571929824561 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7072838977 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212166786577 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907153508264 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624056318031 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15603838408 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477176381521 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.