Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
In this globalized world, every occupant should bear the responsibility to protect the environment which is relevant other than daily routine but the future of the next generation. However, phenomena that people overlook always exist and disposals are in an urgent need to be figured out.
With the advent of technological and intelligent times, a majority of harmful waste products such as electronic components or batteries can not avoid being a negligible drawback, especially in the case that people often combine all types of rubbish for convenience. To address this incidental problem, the government must pay significant attention to enacting disciplines or standards to regulate the rubbish recycling process, and more garbage throwing sites should be established. For example, since Shanghai is always the priority of the demonstration initiative, a large number of recycling bins was rapidly set up during one week in 2019 and the result tended to be a great success.
Moreover, autos are pulling out much more toxic gases than ever. To cope with this harmful waste, a low-carbon living style may well be employed by individuals nowadays. Manufactory and even advertisement should popularize bicycles, while walking also benefits young pupil rather than taking private cars. On the societal level, public transportation thus needs to speed up and be safe enough to eliminate the consideration of people.
In conclusion, as a resident of the world, one should never underestimate the effect he may exert on the surroundings, and the government seems to be another essential part to pave a resourceful road for tomorrow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-26 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-23 | huongnguyendieu | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-10 | congnguyen05x204 | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Sen Ho | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | jadenguyen | 56 | view |
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 61
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...iority of the demonstration initiative, a large number of recycling bins was rapidly set up durin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3828125 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06336682567 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68359375 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0752861 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.8 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0752185476954 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255077946657 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249654902304 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407715264526 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241304073766 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.