In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages ?
In the future, all vehicles will be autonomous and passengers will be the only person inside these means of transportation. Despite some benefits of it, I believe that overall the drawbacks are more significant.
Admittedly, self-driving cars have several positive impacts. Firstly, it contributes to reducing operating expenses. Transportation businesses will no longer have to hire drivers who account for nearly 50% spending. As a result, huge salary payment can cut. Secondly, when enterprises do not have to pay the employee salary, they can spend more money on enhancing service and vehicles' quality as well. This lead to attracting the great number of customers and building credibility and reputation that are vital to the sustainable development of a company.
However, the above benefits negate because of the following problems. First, autonomous vehicles cause rising unemployment of thousands of drivers. There are many people make living by driving, so when this job is redundant, they have to quit their job and find another one in completely new field. The second disadvantage of this trend is the fact that an autonomous vehicle can replace human when it comes to unexpected situation. It seems that an autonomous vehicle install in advance and follow certain instruction on a road. Sometimes, an urgent problem can happened, however, it can not solve the problem quickly, actively, and efficiently as human beings. This can results in passengers’s health and even worse their lives.
In conclusion, I believe that the benefits of self-driving vehicles can not outweigh its drawbacks. These kind of vehicles can develop if it assure the safety and employment for citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...ssengers will be the only person inside these means of transportation. Despite some benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 673, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...d efficiently as human beings. This can results in passengers’s health and even worse t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...ehicles can not outweigh its drawbacks. These kind of vehicles can develop if it assure th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assures'?
Suggestion: assures
...hese kind of vehicles can develop if it assure the safety and employment for citizens....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38721804511 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00280881192 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627819548872 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.015465646 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2941176471 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207494251271 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599897397753 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100570800764 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149124469499 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1083026365 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.