Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree of disagree?
It is widely claimed that to deal with a variety of environmental issues nowadays, the most effective solution is to upgrade the price of fuel. Many people believe in other better ways, however, I completely agree with this opinion.
First of all, the shortage of combustibles is capable of being improved. Practically, the majority of fuel exploited and utilized are non-renewable energy, so they only could meet the demand of humankind contemporarily, which will definitely run out in the near future. By imposing higher cost on fuel, the requests for this energy will be decreased as a consequence occurring from the law of supply and demand. Countries, businesses and families will have to take usage of fuel into consideration in order to ensure a sustainable economic and financial situation. As a result, there will be less likely for dwellers to use fuel wastefully.
One more important benefit of this method is that it encourages administrations and departments to take most advantage of renewable energy. When the requirements for fuel no longer remain high, alternative sources are allowed to be invested widely. Instead of paying for expensive and harmful fuel, politicians and investigators could have a chance to approach permanent resources by using subsidies for experiments and installment. Solar panels, turbines, hydroelectricity systems,... can be taken as examples. This is also true with inhabitants. Although renewable energy has not been prevalent to the majority of people, by being aware of dissipation of expenditure for coal, oil and gas, under no circumstance do they decline to get access to environmentally friendly resources. People can not only save money but also earn from that. In Vietnam, recently, those families who install solar panels save an amount of electricity and sell it to the government instead of paying the electricity bill monthly.
In conclusion, direct impact on the cost of fuel, in my opinion, is the most possible and helpful manner with a view to improving the state of emergency at this time. Based on practical features, the establishment achieved after applying this measure is undeniable and inevitable.
- the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000 summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000 summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar graph shows a comparison of the figures for tropical deforestation for the year 1990 and 2000 The pie chart indicates the causes of tropical deforestation during the period from 2000 to 2005 96
- Some people think the main purpose of schools is to turn people into good citizens and workers rather than benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I completely agree with this opinion. First of all, the shortage of combustibl...
^^^
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly for dwellers to use fuel wastefully. One more important benefit of this metho...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...nels, turbines, hydroelectricity systems,... can be taken as examples. This is als...
^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Although renewable energy has not been prevalent to the majority of people, by ...
^^
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l and gas, under no circumstance do they decline to get access to environmentally...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f paying the electricity bill monthly. In conclusion, direct impact on the cost...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33139534884 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15350037728 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622093023256 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0756212001 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100093283416 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281603997568 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258191901874 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064100594238 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211974849672 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.