TOEFL TPO 42 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading passage and the listening section are both discussing how glass changed to prevent birds from getting injures. The article gives some reasonable arguments; however, the speaker casts doubts about them and proposes several reasons to refute them.
First of all, the article mentions that one-way glass can help birds direct into the right way; however, the speaker disagrees with it and suggests that the glass reflect the sky like the regular mirror. On the other hand, the birds cannot understand the mirror so they consider the reflection is the sky. As a result, changing the glass to one-way glass is not a practical solution.
Secondly, the article indicates that painting colorful lines on the window glass avoids birds to fly through the glass. Nonetheless, the speaker disapproves of this idea and argues that birds may fly through the glass because the glass seems like a hole. Moreover, inside the building, people will feel dark due to the design of window glass if the open hole is too small.
Finally, the article points out that installing an artificial magnetic field to navigate birds fly away from buildings but the speaker refutes this statement. Birds, which fly a long distance, use the magnetic field to guild; however, in the short distance, birds guild their direction through their eyes and the light.
- TPO 40 70
- TPO 47 3
- TPO45 In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better to able to make decision about their own lives 73
- If you are a leader for a group of three to four people which of the following features are the most important when choosing group members honesty the ability to get along well with others the ability to communicate clearly 73
- Some people think that if companies prohibit sending emails to staff on weekend or during other time out of office hours Staff s dissatisfactions with their companies will decrease Others think this will not reduce the overall dissatisfactions among staff 73
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 221 250
No. of Characters: 1087 1200
No. of Different Words: 130 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.856 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.919 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.254 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 77 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.485 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.9 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.428 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.685 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.147 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4