In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars.
Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In many countries, small town-center stores constantly cease trading, and dwellers tend to travel to megamalls. Consequently, those who possess no private vehicles may undergo limited access to basic goods or have to purchase new automobiles which likely worsen the environmental state that is already alarming. The following paragraphs discuss whether this trend brings more upsides or downsides and reach a reasonable conclusion.
Firstly, this change can adversely affect indigenous people’s financial state. As for shop owners, they can financially suffer from the decline of customers, some can even shut down the business and go bankrupt. It can be detrimental to the local economy as a result. Moreover, some residents who are too impoverished to purchase cars can have less access to essential goods. Secondly, the phenomenon encourages increased traffic leading to higher highway accident rates as well as road damages. Accordingly, local authorities are forced to spend more funds on this issue by cutting funds from other areas.
It is believed that traveling to suburban supermarkets impulses extensive purchase. That means more loads of affordable goods purchased and greater time-saving simultaneously take place. However, despite the time and money saved, people still need to pay for traveling fees and extra fees when they travel far from their homes. Additionally, intense movement causes travelers’ fatigue.
To recapitulate, traveling to suburban stores instead of obtaining essentials in local shops is likely to negatively influence the indigenous economy and transport system. I wholeheartedly believe that the imperfection of the trend apparently surpasses its merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 61
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 84
- Some people today believe that the world s increase in population is unsustainable and will eventually lead to a global crisis Other people believe that world population increase is necessary and beneficial as it creates the growth of the world s economy 87
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trend apparently surpasses its merits.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, consequently, first, firstly, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, as for, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76984126984 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02145473448 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702380952381 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2244841767 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145151710421 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395234890315 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442173164286 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726623132457 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431031045007 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.