The graph below shows information about the languages that 13-year-old students in one school chose to study.
The graph shows how many 13-year-old students studied French and Mandarin between 2000 and the present day in a school in England.
Overall, it can be seen that more students have been choosing to study Mandarin, but French is still the most popular language option.
According to the data, Mandarin has increased in popularity during this time. On the other hand, the trend for French is the opposite. In 2000, the number of students who took French was 150, compared to just under 10 students who chose Mandarin. So there was a significant difference in numbers at this time. Over the next five years, the figure fell considerably for French, but rose dramatically for Mandarin and reached a peak at 75 students.
Since 2005, the trends have not changed as much. French gained some popularity in 2006, but has remained fairly stable since then at about 90 students. In contrast, the number of students taking Mandarin dipped in 2006 and then fluctuated, before it returned to 75.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-28 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | thao_tran9999 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | thao_tran9999 | 91 | view |
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are made 61
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The graph below shows information about the languages that 13 year old students in one school chose to study 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91017964072 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51918665628 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658682634731 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.879303631 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181185657069 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641247597782 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104393532695 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138565608798 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126820941978 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.