The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The bar graph illustrates the frequency of eating at fast-food eateries over a decade from 2003 and 2013 in the USA.
Overall, most Americans ate at a fast-food restaurant at least once a week over the 10-year period.
In 2003, at least 3 out of every 10 Americans consumed fast food at an eatery either weekly or every fortnight. Only about 5% of the population indicated that they have never had a take-out meal in a restaurant. This was similar to the pattern recorded from the survey in 2006, with roughly one-third of the residents eating out every week. By 2013, a significant percentage of the populace at almost 35% ate fast-food either once or twice a month.
It is interesting to note that two out of every five US citizens who frequent restaurants ate several times on a weekly basis in 2006 than any other year. All through the decade, less than a tenth of Americans ate every day at a restaurant or never consumed any fast-food meal when combined together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-08 | ililmaidatuz | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | Thanh Maris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | Dora_Naru | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-15 | baokhanh | 67 | view |
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up To what extent do you agree or d 73
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 70
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
- Describe the bar chart 11
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news Would it be better if more good news was reported 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71511627907 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65281338866 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622093023256 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3419072224 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221470096097 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106629488373 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705520364246 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156407234514 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341624411654 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.