People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The dilemma of whether to choose mind over heart or vice-a-versa is not uncommon. Whilst the rational ones are mocked for being callous, the emotional ones are derided for being too sensitive. However, I mostly agree with the prompt that the people who tend to make decisions based on their emotions make poor decision for the below discussed reasons.
Its easy to be wise after the event. Which means it is always easier to judge a situation after it has occurred. So why not be more prudent when the time is right? Prudent here basically means being rational. Taking a decision based on your emotion may content you temporarily but in the long term this decision can take a shape of regret. For an instance, it is always advisable to invest today for a better future, not only for yourself but also for your generations to come. But people generally neglect this, they think on the emotional side and tend to save their money for ‘now’, nobody likes to take a risk in this dynamic world. Practical people on the other side, listen to their rational minds and make a wise decision of investing now for a better future. And certainly, in a long term they do are secured.
While this is certainly valid at an individual level, being logical also helps at a broader level such as in businesses, while running a country etc. Today, in the world of innovation where start-ups are competing the already established MNCs and are leading the world in various aspects. This was possible only because of the leaders behind those great start-ups who took the right decisions based on their logic which was then required. Similar is the case with a President/ Prime minister running a country. For an instance, when a reform is made- there will always be a certain number of people protesting it, but neither its feasible nor wise to amend it. Provided the decision is logical and data-driven which will eventually help people in long term.
However, one might argue that its good to be more human than rational. This might hold true for some extent when it comes to your family, friends, and personal relationships. But the history speaks that in the long run it is always the logic that leads to life-changing decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 58
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies 53
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 53
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75388601036 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48389399708 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0422112877 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.380952381 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52380952381 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254023628017 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702662491649 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118218397945 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159489055023 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984150526904 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.