In some countries, people are spending long hours at the workplace. Why does this happen? Is it a positive or negative development?
The employees are taking long hours at their companies. There are various reasons for this phenomenon and I believe that it is a negative growth.
It is common sense to say that long hours at companies stems from several underlying factors. Firstly, longer hours working can bring a higher payment. For example, it is reported that 70% of companies in Japan cut their employees’ monthly bonus if they do not work overtime. Consequently, when a person wants better wages, he will have to spend more time at the workplace. Secondly, the facilities installed in companies are becoming more and more convenient, which satisfy the employees’ requirement about the working environment. For example, about 51% workers of FPT corporation choose their company’s break room to have a nap time instead of going home when their company started serving lunch and break rooms for their employees.
From my perspective, longer time at the workplace is a no-good evolution. Firstly, the laborers will shorten the time with their families when they spend more time at work. Consequently, the relationship among the members will have distance, which can affect their mental health as well as working productivity. Secondly, working for a long time also leads to some physical health issues like obesity and degenerative spine when they have no time to do exercise. This not only seriously affects their job but also to their lives and families.
In conclusion, several factors might lead to the increase of hours in the workplace, and I am convinced that this is a negative expansion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Lanlanlanlan | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | Lanlanlanlan | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | Lanlanlanlan | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-02 | TreeTree | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | Tran Thi Thuy Duong | 73 | view |
- In some countries people are spending long hours at the workplace Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should be involved in the decision making process too Discuss both views and give your own opinion 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f FPT corporation choose their company’s break room to have a nap time instead of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16342412451 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80421404426 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4938525076 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7857142857 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145380888876 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064556361087 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530585030979 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120540125248 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508694731764 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.