A nation should require all of its students to study the same curriculum until they enter college
The statement suggests that all the students of a nation be subject to the same curriculum until they enter college. This may have its own advantages as well as disadvantages which need to be examined before adopting the recommendation.
Students, in many countries, have the liberty to choose their courses according to their proclivity and acumen. They may take up classes, or take part extra-curricular activities such as sprts or clubs. By giving students the freedom to make their own choice, they are encouraged work towards their future from an early age. However, pressing the same curriculum for all the students of an entire nation for generations would be impact their lives immensely. Having the same subjects would undoubtedly help those who are unsure of what field they want to pursue. For instance, if a student does not know he has a penchant for literature, but him being introduced to the many verticals of literary work in school would help him find his niche.
Typical school subjects like Math, Science or History provide a basic knowledge essential for every child's future regardless of his professional goals. Artists should know basic arithmetic to manage his finances, a Math Professor should know about the Vietnam war and a Research Scientist must be proficient in language. No matter what a student in inclined towards, having a rudimentary understanding of a few domains provides immesurable benefits.
Conversely, all students studying the same curriculum may have a few disadvantages. Students may feel compelled to learn things they might or might not need in the future. If they are, by chance, unable to score well in a subject they dislike or have no predilection for, they could be disheartened and unmotivated. This can damage a child's confidence for life. A Math enthusiast finds difficult to pass Biology but he needs to get through to attain a good GPA, and get into a good college. It is, of course, unfair that students would be judged, not on the basis of their strong suits, but as a standardised criterion.
In conclusion, a homogeneous curriculum has a handful of benefits, but also poses a couple of disadvantages. A more flexible system in place of the same curriculum would help the students according to their needs. Every child is different. It is not correct to look at every one of them through the same glass. They should have the freedom to make their own choice, whether to take up certain courses, or to study a more general curriculum should be up to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 59
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities 79
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same curriculum until they enter college 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is not correct to look at every one of them through the same glass. They should...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97635933806 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89305105793 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524822695035 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1335047468 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6818181818 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294142492284 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859857598203 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104895738904 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176917066739 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822234439725 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.