It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments, such as the South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, technological advancement has allowed humans to overcome many of the harsh environmental conditions, and scientific researchers are able to reach further into the unknown more than ever. This leads to some interesting results, and most concur with the development’s benefits.
On the one hand, vast amounts of progress were made when scientists were able to set foot in the South pole. Studies about the poles geology and biology became much clearer and more precise as researchers have opportunities to operate in the field. Much of the knowledge gained will be used to help humans understand the Earth better and help to preserve the environment, especially when global warming is being more severe. Moreover, the harsh conditions can sometimes be used to conduct experiments that previously we were not able to do, thus leading to better evaluation on certain subjects.
On the other hand, disadvantages were found that might threaten the viabilities of scientific expeditions and should not be overlooked. First of all, most research trips are costly and take a large amount of time to conduct. Some argue that the funds required are not worth it and that we should invest in other matters. Secondly, going to a remote area will definitely bring some risk factors, sometimes costing lives. This raises the question of whether we should bet people live or not. Finally, without proper management, too many trips may cause pollution to the area and this pollution is way more complicated to deal with as they are in remote areas. Though there may be many troublesome issues found, I strongly believe that we will find solutions for all and the question of whether the advantages are worth it or not will find a definite answer.
In conclusion, it is too early to decide whether the benefits of scientific expeditions outweigh the drawbacks, but in due time, many issues will be solved and expeditions will be necessary in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | maiduc | 89 | view |
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In many countries today people buy a range of household goods television microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 11
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows the development of the cutting tool in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram below shows how to operate a hot air balloon 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'poles'' or 'pole's', 'polis's'?
Suggestion: poles'; pole's; polis's
...ot in the South pole. Studies about the poles geology and biology became much clearer...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...s, sometimes costing lives. This raises the question of whether we should bet people live or not. Final...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 769, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...that we will find solutions for all and the question of whether the advantages are worth it or not will...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08049535604 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80501165202 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6832483923 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10157669953 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333555342795 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284534194535 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515229639182 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194428224137 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.