People are living longer than in the past. Many people think that this trend is negative for society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, thanks to the rapid medical advancement with state-of-the-art healthcare facilities, the people’s longevity are significantly increasing. It is a common belief that this phenomenon would exert pernicious impacts on the community. From my perspective, I genuinely agree with this assumption and this essay would provide valid support for my verdict.
Initially, it is quite tangible that one of the most adverse effects of the proliferation of the aged is the adverse effects on the medical system. This is mainly derived from the fact that, the older individuals are, the more health-related problems they have to confront; thus, when rising life expectancy occur, there would be an overwhelming burden on the healthcare system. In Japan, for instance, the aging population with a vast majority of above-70 citizens in its population, has witnessed a serious lack of medical practitioners and medical facilities to aid aged patients. As can be seen from this real example, the expansion of people’s longevity would irrefutably take a toll on the medical field.
The other justification behind the negativity of longer life expectancy refers to the huge source of national budget might have to be spent to keep the national pension system running properly. As a matter of fact, citizens above 70 are often regarded as being retired and not a part of the labour force. Additionally, most state officials and enterprises in many nations are responsible for paying the pension and allowance for the aged, which occupies a large proportion of the demography. Consequently, it’s not an exaggeration to indicate that the ever-increasing longevity of people is detrimental as it is putting the national pension system on the verge of bankruptcy.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I hold a strong belief that the increasing life expectancy is negative regarding its adverse influences on the healthcare and national pension system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | lennie.butera | 73 | view |
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management work and interpersonal skills To what extent do you agree or disagr 73
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, regarding, so, thus, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40453074434 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2272106882 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556634304207 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1850256476 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133229362751 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484353648597 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327663615883 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812287717182 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285046315911 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, regarding, so, thus, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40453074434 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2272106882 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556634304207 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1850256476 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133229362751 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484353648597 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327663615883 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812287717182 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285046315911 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.