The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online. The table shows the average number of people online each year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart compares the proportion of languages being used on the Internet in December 2001. The table provides information about the total number and the percentages of internet users in 5 different years between November 1997 and August 2001.
Overall, the majority of the language used online was English. In addition, the number or the proportion of the internet users had increased throughout the period.
English almost took up to half of the online language. In order words, there was 41% of the language used on the internet was English, four times higher than Chinese and Japanese. Spanish and German were surprisingly lower than Chinese, with 6.5% and 6.7% respectively. Small proportions of others languages such as Korean, Italia, French, Dutch, Portuguese added up to about a quarter of the total.
Regarding the data table, whilst the number of people who had accessed to the internet soared up dramatically, the proportion was slowly. To be precise, the total figure raised about six fold from 76 million to 516 million users. Meanwhile, in comparison with the world population, the percentage of internet users only went up from 1.8% to 8.4%.
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002 It includes those with a degree those with a higher degree postgraduates and those with other qualifications 73
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online The table shows the average number of people online each year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo Japan listened to music over the previous month The pie chart shows a record company s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music 84
- Traffic congestion is becoming increasingly problematic in major cities What solution can you suggest to solve the problems 67
- to some people studying the past is the best way to help young people function well in the modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree what other measures could be effective in helping young people to function well in the modern world 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17368421053 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69023575566 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9522262522 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3636363636 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181328698539 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701738375334 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505176197368 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118159652582 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451890909144 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.