Many high street shops have gone out of business in recent years. Why do you think this has happened? Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, many retail outlets on high streets have gone out of business. Personally, I think that the main reason belongs to online shopping. In my point of view, this issue brings negative developments to producers.
It is common to believe that online shopping in recent years is much more superior to offline shopping as it brings various benefits for customers. Their rationale is that social trading platforms allow users to access and experienced every type of item without finding it directly at several selling locations. Take Shoppe, for example, this application allows users to pick their items through an interface displaying every product from various producers or retailers. As a result, it will be easier for consumers to buy what they want without buying it at high street shops.
From my perspective, although web-based stores are convenient for consumers, they bring negative consequences for manufacturers as it reduces their competitive advantages with other brands. Take Converse, for example, the company has to cut off many of their headquarters which was their number one advantage with other rivals with the appearance of online shopping. As a result, sellers may suffer from profit reduction with this arising issue. Furthermore, online shopping seems affordable for buyers as they have numerous vouchers or discount codes that are appealing. Take Shoppe, for example, customers can acquire hundreds of discount codes through several Black Fridays or transactions. This may affect customer intention for shopping offline, especially on the high street.
In conclusion, having considered the main reason for the disappearance of high street shops, I believe that it is a negative development. This is because online shopping platforms are very global nowadays.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-23 | Huy Vu | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-07 | happycathappy | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | driverhiepkhachvnteam | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-04 | Luta | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | EELLeeee | 78 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 63
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people say it is government responsibility to transport children to school While others believe parents should transport their children to school Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that it is effective for students to study in a group at school while others think it is better to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngs negative developments to producers. It is common to believe that online shop...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, may, so, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48913043478 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83262667714 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.945275131 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212098166825 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081552730362 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751170709928 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163577705477 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834783584829 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.