Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Controversial topics are psychological. It totally depicts the experience of people. Everyone person in the world has their own set of beliefs which they create based upon their personal experience. To understand another perspective, one has to be liberal in believing others and understanding their story. Therefore, Controvial topic discussion may not be useful with a contrasting view as particular perception or thought totally depend upon a personal journey and opposition may refuse to accept it as fact.
Everyone person is different. They had a different life, went through different levels of struggle. Therefore have a different visions to see the world. Controversial topic based upon someone life also has another angle to see. If we discuss have a discussion about the topic maybe people will not agree. Some may have a contrasting view. Restrain to believe that it could also happen. Well, no one is wrong over here. Putting your own view may seem contradictor to the world. But, no one is wrong in their beliefs. Such as, Take an example of Destiny, though high-level psychological subject it is. Some belive that we can be change our destiny. We can create our future, while some say that they don't believe. Destiny can't be changed. . This topic is subjective. It totally depend upon what both side person has experience. And based upon their own personal beliefs, they are stick to their point which seem to contradict and for them to change their view seem to be quite hard because this what life has taught them. One has to be liberal in things to accept the fact and change our own beliefs and view.
Secondly, It is totally about human nature. Some people are so stubborn intentionally that they debate rigorously. So doctrine to their believe and knowledge that they think no one can prove it wrong. In such a case, a person stand firmly to it own point and refute to show a slight inclination toward other side. As in News channel debate, where discussion done on public benefit, opposition stand againts all good thing done for public. Opposition will definitely deny actual and pratical fact and don't accept it
Well, It is not the case every time, some open-minded people do respect other perspectives. Based on the fact of the topic, they do believe to change their view. As in nature of Good Leader. They understand everyone view, respect everyone thought. If found to be in benefit of all. Leader look for other view.
Hence, Discussion of Controversial topic with open-minded people does not seem irritating. They put effort to understand other perspectives. But, discussion with those with a contrasting view may seem quite hard to explain them and don't accept to change their view. Either they may it may be related to personal experience or having stubborn nature to only stick to their own belief.
- People today are much better informed about international news than they were in the past 66
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement all jobs should provide some opportunity for physical exercise 66
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mam mal known as Repenomomus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal s stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers have therefore suggested that R rob 66
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant For instance humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37 C no matter whether the environment is warm or cold Because dinosaurs were rep 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t through different levels of struggle. Therefore have a different visions to see the wor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'vision'?
Suggestion: vision
...of struggle. Therefore have a different visions to see the world. Controversial topic b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...one life also has another angle to see. If we discuss have a discussion about the ...
^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...c maybe people will not agree. Some may have a contrasting view. Restrain to believe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 699, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...te our future, while some say that they dont believe. Destiny cant be changed. . Thi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ome say that they dont believe. Destiny cant be changed. . This topic is subjective....
^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... dont believe. Destiny cant be changed. . This topic is subjective. It totally de...
^
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'depends'?
Suggestion: depends
... . This topic is subjective. It totally depend upon what both side person has experien...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...debate rigorously. So doctrine to their believe and knowledge that they think no one ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wrongs'?
Suggestion: wrongs
...dge that they think no one can prove it wrong. In such a case, a person stand firmly ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...itely deny actual and pratical fact and dont accept it Well, It is not the case e...
^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., they do believe to change their view. As in nature of Good Leader. They understa...
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...veryone view, respect everyone thought. If found to be in benefit of all. Leader l...
^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...may seem quite hard to explain them and dont accept to change their view. Either the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96016771488 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6836919239 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457023060797 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 38.0 20.2370786517 188% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.707056648 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.2631578947 118.986275619 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5526315789 23.4991977007 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.44736842105 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297243018284 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662720023857 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813822068848 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191367278143 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965156957035 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 14.1392134831 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.6 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.