The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The given table provides a comparison of the difficulties in educational ability which students in two primary school over 10-year period.
Overall, it is conspicuous that school A witnessed a downward trend after 10 years whereas the reverse pattern was occurred in school B over the years shown. Moreover, it is clear that the proportion of children face with seven problems in both school fluctuated from 2005 to 2015.
According to the table of both school in 2005, it is clear that following instruction in school A hosted the highest rank at all, with the supplied figure is 42% and more than 7 times when compared with school B's. The number of children deal with problems in reading ability, handwriting in school A is much more higher than school B, which accounted for 22%, 28% in school A and 8%, 7% in school B respectively. Four others remaining skill in school A made up for more than 30% and higher than 2 to 3 times as school B.
Turning to the table in 2015, it is obvious that the number of children in school A experienced the downward trend, which all categories dramatically decrease by 5% or even 24% except reading ability and handwriting. However, the trend in school B was opposed to school A, most of the matters slightly increased by 1% to 5%. In spite of the decline tendency in school A, the number of students struggled with these problems roughly less than school A.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 73
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- The diagram shows the relationship between a numbers of different languages 89
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...bility, handwriting in school A is much more higher than school B, which accounted for 22%,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6622627231 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0933790643 43.030603864 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.875 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.875 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293755034773 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141733469275 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705314006549 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189444465059 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213676879321 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.