The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary, 2000-2010.
The given live graph illustrates 3 bakeries in Calgary and their annual income in a ten year period between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out is that the highest earning bakery in 2000, Mari Bakeshop, had the least yearly income by the end of the decade. While at the same time, the other two bakeries saw an upward trend throughout the mentioned period.
Looking at Bolo Cakery, beginning at only $20000, some fluctuation is seen in the first two years, before profits nearly double in 2003 and remain almost constant for the next 3 years. Meanwhile, Amandine Bakery started off with just below $60000 in profits, which did not improve until 2006. From here on, both these confectionery stores underwent significant increases, with Bolo ending the decade with just above $60000 while the Amandine soared to a mighty $105000.
By contrast, Mari Bakeshop, despite observing some apparent success, could not hold on to initial success and plummeted to a meager $40000, compared to double the value it entered the century with. and leveled off in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-31 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 84
- The chart below gives information about trends in internet use by females in the USA in two years
- Tourism has increased so much over the last 50 years that it is having a mainly negative impact on local inhabitants and the environment However others claim that it is good for the economy Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tourism and give your 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summqrise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... the value it entered the century with. and leveled off in 2008.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96610169492 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36758893249 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.71186440678 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9927879614 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144948399514 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651874296715 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100959652663 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111898952069 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122881118825 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.