The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Given is the table depicting how many minutes in total of British phone calls in three distinct areas, namely their local, national and international and mobiles over a period of 8 years, commencing from 1995.
It is conspicuous that the number t of minutes reported in the nation and overseas as well as mobile calls saw an upward trend, while calling in local fluctuated over the time frame, however, despite several swings, it was by far the most popular type of calling.
In 1995, starting at close to 72 million minutes, the data of local-fixed line leaped steadily and reached the highest peak at exactly 90 billion in 1999 before experiencing a gradual plunge during the next four years. At the end of the period, the figure registered as the same as the first year.
When it comes to the number of minutes in the two remaining types, national and international landline calls were lower twofold than that local calls in 1995. Meanwhile, only 3 billion were recorded in mobile calls. Nevertheless, the figures for national/international and mobile calls rose drastically over time with around 60 billion and 45 billion respectively.
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time to work is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 billion and 45 billion respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03664921466 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89662731866 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65445026178 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7420904739 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.428571429 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199785546599 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877600189412 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579695598102 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117969461704 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545982633232 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.