Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one or two serious ones, and what ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems?
Many people believe that an overcrowding in big cities is the source of severe traffic congestion. However, building a sufficient transportation system could tackle this issue.
One of the impacts of the overpopulated city is severe traffic jams, leading to the downfall of people’s everyday productivity. To put it more simply, more population means a rise in mobility, resulting in more people commuting from one place to another. This leads to a loaded vehicle on the road. For instance, a survey done by the Indonesian Ministry of Transportation reveals that a 2% increase in population addition in Jakarta would impact a 13% rise in private vehicle volume on protocol roads. This is caused by the 20% increase of people who commute to the neighboring city to work. Hence, the addition of big cities’ inhabitants results in traffic congestion.
Nevertheless, establishing public transportation system could be the ultimate solution to solve this issue, decreasing the vehicle volume on the road. If the public transportation system is punctual, convenient, and accessible, people would be more encouraged to use it rather than driving their vehicles. According to a study done by Urban Planning students of Bandung Institute of Technology towards 1000 LRT commuters in Jakarta, around 70% of workers prefer to use LRT due to convenience. Also, the emergence of LRT has decreased the volume of vehicles on the protocol street by more than 50% in 2 years, although Jakarta's population increased by 2% each year. Thus, well-built transportation facilities have proven to solve traffic congestion issues.
To conclude, although overpopulation in the urban areas lead to traffic jam, a well-established transportation system could be of the solution to tackle this problem.
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 73
- Gender Equality 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Some people think that the government should provide free education at every level However some say individuals should pay for their university education 78
- Some people think it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis and swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40143369176 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23409131238 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544802867384 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.76091372 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.642857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0763524634621 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274144847757 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499666418497 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658724418127 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657748442272 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40143369176 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23409131238 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544802867384 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.76091372 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.642857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0763524634621 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274144847757 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499666418497 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658724418127 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657748442272 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.