the chart below show the film participation in Australia and also shows the typical film trips of different age groups from 1996 to 2000. take a look at the data and select and announce key highlights.
The table illustrates the number of people who visited the cinema and the average frequency of visitors of all ages between 1996 to 2000. Whereas, the line graph demonstrates the visitors with different age groups in the same years in Australia. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, more than half of the Australians are interested in cinema and the rate was increased over the years. Along with that the overwhelming majority of youngsters with the age of 14 to 24 are the main ages of film participation.
In the table, about 62% of people attended the film while the average frequency of visits with 10.3%. However, after one year there were a significant increase in visitors with 72% and the average was 11.1%. Whereas, for the following years the average frequency of visitors in Australia was 8.3% when the participation remained steadily with 72 % at the end of the period.
regarding the line graph, people with 14 to 24 and 25 to 35 years were around 15% in 1996 compared to around 12 % and 10% respectively in the other two age groups( 35 to 49 and more than 50). After that, there was a slight increase in all age groups and reached more than 20% in 14 to 24 years group and 15% in the above 50 years. Moreover, all other age groups also has some fluctuation over the years and rose peak at near 25 % of 14 to 24 years in 1999 after declined to 15% in 1998. Nevertheless, the graph finished at below 15%( 14 to 24 years) and above 10%( 50 above) and the other two groups are approximately 14% and 15% respectively.
- the chart below shows the percentage off the energy generate from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 to summarise information by selecting key characteristics and compiling a report and if necessary make a comparison
- some people believe that government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Other think that building more wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- the diagram below shows spending on five unique items for children 18 and multi year 2010 2014
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below provides information on rental charges and salaries in three areas of London 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...itors of all ages between 1996 to 2000. Whereas, the line graph demonstrates the visito...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a significant increase in visitors with 72% and the average was 11.1%. Whereas, ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Regarding
... with 72 % at the end of the period. regarding the line graph, people with 14 to 24 an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57246376812 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65010077802 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452898550725 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2836634727 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137227011377 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575440374113 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382720681785 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891044707698 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241516213857 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.