the chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant
The provided chart illustrates the percentage of accommodator in in five different urban territories including Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane Adelaide and Hobart who tended to have different options to purchase coffee by. Overall, in all cities people mostly preferred to go to a cafe while buying fresh coffee was a low-prioritized selection over the span of last 4 weeks.
Transparently, Melbourne and Hobart allocated around 64% in café selection category, meanwhile the latter city stood t highest percentage of share in buying instant coffee by relatively 54%. In addition, in Sydney in spite of existed nearly similar contribution of residents in buying instant and fresh coffee by around 44%, going to café.
Clearly, another noticeable share in having fresh coffee was for Brisbane and Adelaide by allocating 34% of share what is also remarkable is the fact that in Adeline despite other cities, people were mostly intended to have an instant coffee in comparison with going toa café; additionally, it should be noted that in mentioned location the percentage difference between instant coffee and café category was not particularly eye catching and they were 49% and 48%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-23 | Sarina2021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-29 | Sarina2021 | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-29 | Sarina2021 | 73 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the cases What can be done this problem 89
- The bar chart below shows the US top ten processed food export markets for last year and six years ago Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The photo is in the next post 78
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 73
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue some people think this money should not be invested this much To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The Statement should reflect your ability to communicate clearly and provide an overview of your academic and research background your professional and career goals and your area of research interest Additionally the Statement should describe a rationale 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...ustrates the percentage of accommodator in in five different urban territories includ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 't the highest'.
Suggestion: t the highest
...tegory, meanwhile the latter city stood t highest percentage of share in buying instant c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, as for, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41711229947 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9652876558 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631016042781 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.824714819 43.030603864 288% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 202.6 112.824112599 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4 22.9334400587 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 5.23603664747 222% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139547839647 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082725082115 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281238744894 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10050621672 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301415698262 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 61.2550243902 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.3012195122 183% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.