The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
“Respect for ourselves guides our morals, respect for others guides our manners”. I am consonant with the prompt to a great extent. It is blatant that to understand any particular society we have to understand as well as examine the character of men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or the role models. The demeanor, as well as the characters of the society of the various people, is determined by the various role models and heroes. In the light of the demeanor of the people, the manners of role models are predicated on the behaviors of the various peoples.
Throughout the times of history, it was found that there are ample examples to prove that various people’s characters are dictated by their role models. “The light of Asia” Gautam Buddha is the perfect example to explain the prompt that has been presented above. The Gautam Buddha was born in an ambiance where there is a sense of cooperation among the people and where the people inside the realm are so munificent so these types of characters were also presented in the Gautam Buddha had it not been the case where the people are not munificent these types of traits wouldn’t have been found in the Gautam Buddha. On the contrary, the most wanted terrorist of the world Osama Bin Laden who had created the tumultuous as well as havoc throughout the world in this century by doing unethical activities was born in an ambiance where there is frequently tiff and commotion among the people various types of the illegal activities were constantly happening so these types of unethical and wicked characters are found is inherited to the Osama Bin Laden.
In our society also we can find a society where the one state leader is so magnanimous where his deeds were frequently for the welfare of the people where he never brags or boasts about his success we can dictate that the people’s demeanor, as well as the behavior of that Magnanimous people society, is well whereas, On the contrary, that is an opposite case where one’s leader is ingrained towards himself it is certitude that the people character is not good as well. However, some people may argue that the leader’s character does not play any role to dictate the character of a certain society by providing ample examples. For example, Hitler who was one of the world most cruel dictators the world has ever witnessed have got the people around his ambiance who were so naïve and as well as magnanimous. Would it have been the leader’s character that would determine the demeanor of society the Hitler must be munificent but that is the opposite case?
As long as the argument above is presented here is an interwinding relationship between the lead character and as well as society people’s character the society people’s character can easily be dictated by their heroes or as well as role models.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- It is inevitable that as technology advances traditional cultures will be lost It seems that we cannot have these two things together To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 59
- Benton City residents have adopted healthier lifestyles A recent survey of city residents shows that the eating habits of city residents conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago During those ten years loca 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent Another study however sugg 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, whereas, for example, as well as, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2373.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82317073171 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58853652664 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.392276422764 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.583571656 60.3974514979 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.5 118.986275619 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1428571429 23.4991977007 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26987903991 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120465807071 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154787026964 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209023009821 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128466050032 0.0667264976115 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.