The charts below show the Internet use for different purposes in Australia in 2010,2011 and the percentage by users.
The given bar charts provide a comparison of the level of Internet users in terms of social media, online purchasing, emailing, and the proportions of people in each field.
From an overall perspective, it is conspicuous that emailing comes as the most preferred activity among the three categories. Subsequently, one particularly interesting fact highlighted by the figure is the stable percentage of Internet users whose ages range from 40 to 60 in all diagrams.
Taking a look at the first graph, it is evident that the Internet catered to more than 70 percent of people in Australia in 2010 and 2011, with a share of it was more than 20% when compared with others. While this proportion in the two remaining groups was just merely around 50 percent.
Moving to the three remaining graphs, it is conspicuous that teenagers whose ages from 18 to 25 had a tendency for owning an account on social media than other age groups. Noticeably, the number of Internet users who are 40 to 60 years old met the same record in all three diagrams. While the seniors whose ages above 65 hosted the highest rank in participating in the Internet for online disbursement and sending email, this number come at the least preferred activity in the social media field.
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works 78
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 84
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ore than 20% when compared with others. While this proportion in the two remaining gr...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...oticeably, the number of Internet users who are 40 to 60 years old met the same record ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85581395349 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73579323589 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0786094708 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158769297291 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617099650127 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444593800415 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905208115413 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120065259497 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.