Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home while others believe children should learn this at school Discuss both views

Essay topics:

Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home, while others believe children should learn this at school. Discuss both views.

Have some human trust that children should be teaching about reuse and keep away from home, however other people believed that children should study that at school. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of children should be taught about recycling at school.First, education system for children are promoted education standards to equalize educational students skills regardless of their family background.
This education support, presumably tends not only to increase students skills on any subjects but also to mitigate their practice of students, education system is set out from appropriate standards for students, so recycling is an important thing that students need to learn because it can help students form a habit of not wasting, which students can apply on their own. garbage for recycling and at school there will be more tools for children to practice with understandable support from teachers and friends. Second, students learning recycling would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic and environment development in any nations.
Nevertheless, children should be taught about recycling and waste time at home. First, school is study place and children will learning all subjects in here but children learning about 13 subjects now so if children study that subjects in school is would likely correspond with a stress study and tremendous financial on a country because governments just need have many teachers because open new ones and put more pressure on the next generation when they have to learn more extracurricular activities. So, children should learning recycling at home because children have many free time will lazy study and not research environment subjects, just have parents can teaching student about environment and recycling garbage or other, meaning that at school have many student so teachers can’t followed everyone but when students learning recycling at home parents can one-by-one instructions for children to help them enjoy learning, avoid wasting time at home, but only playing, instead spend time helping children learn to recycle, sometimes school is still not as good as family educate.
Second, children should learning at home would tempt many talents of children including those who are recycling inclined or show interest in education pursuits, thereby make people have many talents children can be recycling garbage or recycling belongings but when people learning that at school after children study and go back home they will easily forget and potential wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable subjects paths. It, instead, would be a more education viable option if the resources were focused on supporting children awareness of the importance of recycling.
I were discussed both sides of this argument. In my perspective, children should be learning recycling at school will have benefits and effects for children than at home.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-14 Charles Le 84 view
2022-10-14 Charles Le 84 view
2022-07-01 Trần Ánh Vy 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...uld be taught about recycling at school.First, education system for children are pro...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...First, education system for children are promoted education standards to equalize...
^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nds not only to increase students skills on any subjects but also to mitigate the...
^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Garbage
... which students can apply on their own. garbage for recycling and at school there will ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to recycle'.
Suggestion: to recycle
... and friends. Second, students learning recycling would probably result in a greater supp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
...school is study place and children will learning all subjects in here but children learn...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 533, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to recycle'.
Suggestion: to recycle
...ctivities. So, children should learning recycling at home because children have many free...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 791, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'can't' requires base form of this verb: 'follow'
Suggestion: follow
...ool have many student so teachers can’t followed everyone but when students learning rec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 836, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to recycle'.
Suggestion: to recycle
...wed everyone but when students learning recycling at home parents can one-by-one instruct...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
...ness of the importance of recycling. I were discussed both sides of this argument. ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 93, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to recycle'.
Suggestion: to recycle
...erspective, children should be learning recycling at school will have benefits and effect...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 7.85571142285 331% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2704.0 1615.20841683 167% => OK
No of words: 497.0 315.596192385 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44064386318 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69626415067 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468812877264 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 160.525682985 49.4020404114 325% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.142857143 106.682146367 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 20.7667163134 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489954488824 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206020368908 0.084324248473 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162340768716 0.0667982634062 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31595350658 0.151304729494 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11414225474 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 13.0946893788 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.