Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In our society, it is considered that the sole purpose of the government and politicians is to ensure the welfare of the general public by making the right policy decisions. These officials are expected to derive knowledge from the actions of the past members of the goverment, observe changes in economy of the country, and make laws to enforce safe and healthy living standards for the citizens. thus the common masses trust them to make informed decisions, as they are assumed to have better judgement and perspective to see the greater good. But, do government experts and politicians always uphold this trust of the common people?
It is quite evident that politicians and elected members of the government are considered vastly knowledgeable and erudite when it comes to making decisions that influence the lives of the common people. There have been multiple instances throught the world that have shown us that these officials have failed at times to make the right decisions for the welfare of the general public. Firstly, we often presume that politicians or the government, while making such a decision, try to look at it from perspectives of people from all sections of the economy. This has been unfounded a number to time. For example, many taxes are levied on fossil fuels such as petroleum and diesel making it a hard hit for the people of the middle class. Goods and Service taxes on essential commodities often make these unaffordable to the millions of people surviving below the poverty line. These taxes, which are considered to be benefician for the overall economy of the country, often push the common masses to a lower standard of life.
Secondly, we have seen the government often joining hands with the private sector companies, promising huge profits, building factories and industries at the expense of the environment. Forest areas areas are often cleared for this purpose, making it baneful not only for the ecosystem of the place, but also the local residents. These people are rarely compensated or provided with better living opportunites. Thus, in such cases the situation of the native people of that area are completely ignored but the goverment while making policy decisions.
In conclusion, we can say that policticians and goventment experts often do not scruyinise their decisions from the perspectives of the common people. Although promised to be exteremly beneficial, these decions have had a devastating effects on people living below the middle economic class. We have witnessed the common people and social worker protesting against such decision, as seen in the millions of agriculrurists rioting against Farmers' laws in India,vprotests by the lgbtq+ community in many countries, and protests against anti-abortion laws in USA. Hence, we can infer that the goverment and politicians, while making decisions must take into account the perspective and the consequences it would bring upon the common masses, and involve their opinions in the decision making process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | Ying_CHU4.0 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | sam 27 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 66 | view |
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura Sock Inc A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our socks are s 83
- Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates for the past several decades food processing companies have also been adding salicylates to foods as pr 68
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ticians is to ensure the welfare of the general public by making the right policy decisions. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...lthy living standards for the citizens. thus the common masses trust them to make in...
^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...lthy living standards for the citizens. thus the common masses trust them to make in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... right decisions for the welfare of the general public. Firstly, we often presume that politic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: areas
... the expense of the environment. Forest areas areas are often cleared for this purpose, mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overment while making policy decisions. In conclusion, we can say that polictici...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , vprotests
...ts rioting against Farmers laws in India,vprotests by the lgbtq+ community in many countri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 799, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pinions in the decision making process.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21810699588 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77919183639 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487654320988 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6620964157 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.473684211 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5789473684 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180869425134 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631459349548 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652497903702 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123032093495 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686078712517 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ticians is to ensure the welfare of the general public by making the right policy decisions. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...lthy living standards for the citizens. thus the common masses trust them to make in...
^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...lthy living standards for the citizens. thus the common masses trust them to make in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... right decisions for the welfare of the general public. Firstly, we often presume that politic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: areas
... the expense of the environment. Forest areas areas are often cleared for this purpose, mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overment while making policy decisions. In conclusion, we can say that polictici...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , vprotests
...ts rioting against Farmers laws in India,vprotests by the lgbtq+ community in many countri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 799, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pinions in the decision making process.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21810699588 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77919183639 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487654320988 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6620964157 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.473684211 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5789473684 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180869425134 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631459349548 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652497903702 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123032093495 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686078712517 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.