The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the current layout of a public park compared to its initial design in 1920.
Overall, a comparison between the two given maps reveals a shift of Grange Park from a simple area into a densely organized landscape with numerous modern facilities.
Looking into the maps, in 1920, it is notable that the park was simply designed with some infrastructures, namely the fountain in the center of the map. Meanwhile, the seats were distributed ubiquitously in almost every corner of the whole area, while the rose gardens and the stage for musicians also appeared to be noticeable features of the initial design.
However, there have been significant changes within Grange Park, making it more attractive. Firstly, one of the two semi-circled rose gardens adjacent to the north entrance was removed to form a bigger one in the middle of the park, occupying the former fountain. Moreover, the stage for musicians was upgraded into the amphitheater which takes up a larger area on the west flank of the park. The glasshouse was also demolished to make way for a new water feature, together with the appearance of a new entrance to the underground parking area underneath. In addition, the children’s playground was erected in the northeast corner, overtaking the previous pond for water plants. Lastly, all the seats were relocated to surround the new square rose garden, offering spaces for the construction of a new café next to the children’s play area.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting t 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09465020576 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8418550552 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1685527935 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133479178465 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600654170514 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431157036697 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933821214522 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293970310812 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.