Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree?
There are indispensable benefits which are linked with the renovation of roads and motorways. Given the state of gridlocks and traffic congestions, especially during peak hours, the demand for lanes’ expansion to reassure punctuality for workers is burgeoning. After reconstructing inadequate functions, humans could save much time commuting to anywhere regardless of time, which cannot be accomplished before. Additionally, maintaining road safety has been chief among concerns. Specifically, as soon as the public gets access to guarantee while traveling, they are motivated to obey traffic laws since the awareness of safety has been raised over the progress.
A clear inspection may also reveal that attention for public transportations is worthwhile as similar assets are also offered. Firstly, a drop of private automobile uses could be predictable once communal vehicles innovate, thus reducing noxious fumes emitted. As for reemerging air degradation, governments are required to invest more in buses and trains so that the quantity of fossil fuel exploited can be cut down. Thus, since individuals are encouraged to make use of these transports, they have manipulated the income for local drivers. With regard to more frequent public uses , drivers have a gradual increase in their salary, bridging the gap between high income and low wage among society.
In conclusion, there is a school of thought when it comes to fundings allocation. Although some concur that rebuilt lanes can assist inhabitants with safer driving and easy traffic flow, others condemn that money could be better used for developing a public service system which limits the use of other vehicles and motivates local people’s living conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-09 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | Master Panda | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | DNTMdntm | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | diamondvmp | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | Elaineletere | 78 | view |
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 84
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 81
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife animals while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...With regard to more frequent public uses , drivers have a gradual increase in thei...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, thus, while, as for, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57575757576 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93975585234 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689393939394 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0729974239 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980458314043 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305761713635 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319371860461 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655293007396 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231719921554 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.