The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012.
The given tables shed lights on club participants and the local inhabitants’ attitudes towards the newly-constructed cinema in 2012.
As can be seen from the tables, the majority of people were reported to have excellent experience at the new sites and those with poor review made up only a small percentage of survey participants.
When it comes to the cinema’s facility, up to 72% of club participants found it to be excellent, while more than a quarter said they were satisfied and only 2% reported having unpleasant experience. The numbers of that in terms of the general public is 64%, 24% and 8% respectively. In terms of the site’s quality, 40% of those from the general public group are satisfied, which is fourth times higher in comparison with those in the club.
With regard to information’s satisfaction level, while 66% of those from the general public ticked in the excellent box, only more than a half of members rated their experience as excellent, at 54%. Additionally, up to 16% of club participants and 14% of local residents reported having poor experience at the site.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-01 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Pham Van Nhan | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Giang Tran | 11 | view |
- When a new town is planned it is more important to develop public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time in To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 73
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ce. The numbers of that in terms of the general public is 64%, 24% and 8% respectively. In t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of that in terms of the general public is 64%, 24% and 8% respectively. In ter...
^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e site’s quality, 40% of those from the general public group are satisfied, which is fourth ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tion level, while 66% of those from the general public ticked in the excellent box, only more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., up to 16% of club participants and 14% of local residents reported having poor ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01630434783 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08622446157 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5421759516 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132750190329 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687121390769 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356701528528 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829870524705 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349666517678 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.