The given chart illustrates the percentage of people getting news through various media in one country in 2013,2015 and 2017.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage of the population was accessing news via television in all three years and the lowest was through newspapers in 2017. In 2013, 79% of the population watched television for the news, 41% from newspapers whereas the percentage of the population listening to the radio and watching through the internet was the same which was 31%. Similarly, the percentage of the population watching television was 68% in 2015 which was leading by 27% from those who accessed news from the internet. Only 22% of people got news through newspapers which was the least one in 2017, slightly greater was that of radio by 8% in the same year. It can be observed that 30% of the population accessed news through newspapers and radio in 2015 which was exactly the same percentage. In 2017, there was only a difference of 3% between the population receiving news through television and the internet in which percentage of the population who accessed news through the internet lagged to 68%.
In conclusion, few percentages of the population used newspapers and radio to access news.
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment To wh 73
- The given graph shows the proportion of four different materials which were recycled between 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 73
- Formal examination are the only way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as course work and project is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- A large number of deaths are caused by road accidents why do so many road accidents occur Make recommendations that could help to reduce their number 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 2010 in a particular country 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 851, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2017, there was only a difference of 3% between the population receiving news th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93582887701 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76625180457 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427807486631 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4782295987 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195499431153 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124095720615 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315904467384 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144516695778 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489627690872 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.