People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that these days people are able to buy many reasonably priced products. Although there can be no doubt that this trend can be effective for society to a certain extent, I assert that it will create more harm than benefit.
On the one hand, several reasons explained the popularity in the inexpensive price of goods. Firstly, the most significant of which is the number of products consumed which leads to the economic development of countries. This is due to low-priced products encouraging the spenders to buy and consume more. As a result, a large of jobs will be created as companies expand their sales of consumer goods, reducing the unemployment figures and enabling more people to share in the increasing prosperity. In addition, people can buy more goods, for example, TV smarts, phones which can improve their standards of living. And also they save more money on childcare, health, and education.
On the other hand, there are various reasons why I believe low-priced goods bring us more harm. The first reason is that overproduction can affect our environments such as grazing from agriculture or smoking from the factories leads to destruct ozone and air. As a result, the cost of recovering the damage people cause to the habitat is enormous. Moreover, cheaper products are almost invariably associated with poor quality. For example, when cheap imports from China first entered the American and European markets, consumers quickly realized that items such as electronic goods either did not work or quickly broke down and the materials themselves were not durable.
To sum up, besides the variety of advantages of purchasing cheaper goods, I still believe that the disadvantages of low-priced goods outweigh the advantages. As cheaper products are often of low quality and are produced in unsustainable ways,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- Some people think that government should give finacnial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Other believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- With an increasing number of people eating fast food which if eating to regularly can cause health issues some people think that the only solution is ban it completely To what extent do you agree 84
- The bar chart gives information about the food loss and waste at the different stages of production in developed and developing countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 61
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same To what extnet do you agree or disagree 78
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14046822742 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7720931033 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8466989673 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.466666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215040144438 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683587559272 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058307497006 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13164091276 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511032511528 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.