Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading passage tells us that use the box-shape device surrounding the young tree to fight desertification is prone to failure. The lecturer responds by saying that these reasons are not convincing at all, since this proposal is worthwhile and practical.
The first reason that the critic proposes is the problem of budget, for the high cost of each device. If we want to solve the problem of desertification, there will need to grow millions of trees, which is too expensive to conduct. However, The professor points out that the device can be reused once the young tree grows up, so the cost will not be so high, and thus unrealistic to reach
The condition of the residents living in these areas is the second reason that represented by the critic. These devices need people to take care of them, but it is hard to require people to do that for the harsh condition that they encounter. The professor agrees that the it is true that the devices need residents to maintain, but she thinks there are still several possible reward to motivate them. For example, the device can help them collect water, grow crops and build fire wood forest.
The final reason made by the critics says that the device's ability is limited because it can only be operated for the young tree is not supported at all, according to the professor. This statement ignores that when the tree become bigger, it can survive well on its own, which is represented by the empirical data.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-11 | fmichela | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | Liting Mai | 75 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | kk890528 | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | easonl02526 | 71 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | alicegreen13 | 80 | view |
- tpo 65 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use specif 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...roposal is worthwhile and practical. The first reason that the critic proposes i...
^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ey encounter. The professor agrees that the it is true that the devices need residents...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...eason made by the critics says that the devices ability is limited because it can only ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73828125 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49266196013 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6690475583 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0985917285446 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331506459037 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363284908803 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584296874262 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295897706196 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.