Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, environmental quality is getting worse and worse due to the increasing amount of discharge and waste. Many people think that only the government and big companies can have some solution to the problems that humans cannot solve. I completely disagree with the phenomenon.
On the one hand, waste from daily human activities has contributed significantly to environmental pollution. For example, there is a lot of plastic, cans, bottles that are thrown away every day in many restaurants, homes, schools, factories. Garbage will take hundreds of years to be completely removed and they will destroy our land and affect the habitat of other creatures. If only the government takes some measures and all the people take no action, the quality of the environment cannot be improved so one person reduces their waste every day, the amount of garbage will decrease drastically in future. In addition, people also reduce environmental pollution by reducing emissions from their vehicles. For example, during a pandemic year, the world recorded a significant drop in carbon dioxide because most people worked from home and rarely went out. This means that individuals can radically reduce emissions and improve air quality, making the environment healthier.
On the other hand, the admintration should establish an organized plan for the composting of the waste as the indiscriminate dumping of wastes will give rise to harmful diseases such as diarrhea, fever and asthma. Therefore, a separate residential and industrial waste treatment plant is required. For example, the Indian government provides guidance to companies on how waste is collected, sorted and disposed.
In conclusion, environmental protection should start from the consciousness of each individual and be extended by special scientific and reform measures run by governments and large organizations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- country s government should balance costs for foreign tourists in order to suit their customers 56
- job 56
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- environtment 11
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nt of garbage will decrease drastically in future. In addition, people also reduce enviro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54703832753 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02126156835 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3480454713 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135587652439 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468078370278 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658997910723 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812531343814 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354356318187 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nt of garbage will decrease drastically in future. In addition, people also reduce enviro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54703832753 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02126156835 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3480454713 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135587652439 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468078370278 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658997910723 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812531343814 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354356318187 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.