Should government regulate the fast food industries in the same way that regulates the drug, alcohol and tobacco industries? What is your opinion?
Some people think that the government should impose the same regulations on both the fast food sectors and the drug, alcohol and tobacco sectors. In my opinion, I totally disagree about this, thus there are differences in customer and consequence between the quick-lunch sectors and the other sectors.
First of all, the huge difference in customer does not allow the government to apply the same regulation on the fast food industries and the drug, alcohol and tobacco industries. To more detail, the kids are the main customers of the fast food products while the adults or teenagers tend to consume significantly the products of the drug, alcohol and tobacco. For example, unlike 18 or over years old customers, who meet the age standard to consume alcohol, the government should not ban the law on the fast food’s customers who have to be 18 or over years old. This is clearly impossible mission. Therefore, the government should not regulate the same way for these sectors.
In addition, the negative effects of consuming the two sectors are different ways. Firstly, eating more fast food could lead to harmful effects on only customers although drinking more alcohol or smoking damages not only customers but also relative individuals. For instance, the smoke of cigarette effects to both smoker and people who breath unluckily the air pollution. Secondly, the children could be obesity because of consuming more fast food but drinking alcohol or using drug could make customers become violent and thus they could cause other social issues such as crimes. Because of difference in the above negative effects, the government should impose tighter regulation such as higher taxes on the drug, alcohol and tobacco sectors while the regulation on the fast food industries should be fundamentally educational.
In conclusion, there is the necessity of the regulations on the fast food sectors and the drug, alcohol and tobacco sectors in order to reduce the negative effects. I totally believe that the difference of ways being applied by the government is better than the same way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-19 | minhdo9966 | 56 | view |
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and what solutions to it 84
- Should government regulate the fast food industries in the same way that regulates the drug alcohol and tobacco industries What is your opinion 56
- Large companies use sport events to promote their products Some people think this has a negative impact on sports To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many factors motivate people in the workplace Of these money is the most important To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16764705882 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65438691531 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461764705882 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7805029055 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444727915568 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168932921048 0.084324248473 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153989791317 0.0667982634062 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304313295738 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055978742659 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.