Environmental damage is the problem of most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility?
The issues related to environment threat are increasingly common in most countries. This essay will discuss about main factors leading the reality and then offer some actions of the government and individuals which can restore the natural environment.
There are several reasons leading to environmental damage. At the beginning, industrialization without sustainable development planning is the core factor threatening natural resources. This means that using more fossil fuel make not only the air polluted but also overexploited, thus the ozone layer become thinner because of the high extremely CO2 emission in the air and the shine from the sun direct to the earth. This makes the natural habitat suffered from global warming being caused environmental damage. Additionally, a rapid increase in demand of food and accommodation or development space makes human to destroy the forest. This deforestation results in both narrowing down habitat of natural species and lacking natural oxygen supply; and thus, damage natural life environment.
Despite of these factors leading this urgent problem, I believe that organizations and individuals should act via particular solutions protecting the earth’s ecosystem. Firstly, the government should plan sustainable development policies in industrialization path. These policies must encourage energy enterprises to research and develop renewable energy sectors such as wind power farm, solar farm and biology fuel. These power resources are more friendly environmentally than the fossil one. This helps factories, which use renewable energy, reduce CO2 emission or poison smokes to the air and thus natural habitat could be restore as original. Next, every individual bears a crucial responsibility in the environment recovery process. Each choice of an individual such as a kind of food, a consumption of daily products and a living place makes ecosystem better if this choice is more integrated to the environment. For example, consumers must use reusable pills instead of plastic pills.
In conclusion, the human home suffers from global warming being caused environmental damage with above listed factors. I believe in both the government and every individual who can restore the natural environment as its origin.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ttltpttdc | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Kaito Mori | 11 | view |
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Large companies use sport events to promote their products Some people think this has a negative impact on sports To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Should government regulate the fast food industries in the same way that regulates the drug alcohol and tobacco industries What is your opinion 56
- Many factors motivate people in the workplace Of these money is the most important To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many factors motivate people in the workplace Of these money is the most important To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68529411765 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05542090158 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2169525057 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.388888889 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165870398874 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504277727978 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039236314049 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107319388283 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268103609866 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.