The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph illustrates how households in one nation had spent their weekly salary in 1968 and in 2018. Overall, it can be seen that in 1968, people used to buy food more than anything else while in 2018 their weekly income was highly gone for leisure. In addition, their weekly spending on household goods was similar in both years.
To begin with, individuals used to spend %35 of their weekly money on food in 1968 whereas in 2018 only %17 of their weekly expenditure was for buying food. Likewise, people tend to allocate %6 for fuel and power in 1968, but in 2018 it became less than %4. Clothing and footware had %10 of weekly spending in 1968, yet in 2018 it had decreased to %5.
However, when families spent less on leisure in 1968, their weekly spending on leisure had increased to %23 in 2018. The same for housing, %10 of the weekly expenditure had been allocated in 1968 whereas in 2018 households spent almost the double on husing. Comparing to household goods, people spent equally on their house goods in both 1968 and 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The maps below shows an industrial area in the town of Norbition and planned future development of the site Summerise the information by selectig and reporting the main features and make comprarison where relevant 87
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the future nobody wiil buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, whereas, while, as for, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62032085561 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27474587927 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4621481351 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230548997092 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119589691297 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482721052429 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182404828674 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255607857595 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.