In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Do you agree or disagree with | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Do you agree or disagree with?

Nowadays, the improvement of technology provides people with many modern equipment and car is one of the most important things to help people live comfortably. Some people in the world think that the number of cars will decrease in the next twenty years. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement. There are several reasons why I feel this way, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, private transportations, especially cars, are more convenient than public transportations such as bus or train. When people go to some places by bus, they have to follow with the timetable of this service which means that they must arrive at the station on time to catch a bus. Moreover, they sometimes have to catch more than one bus to get to their destination. However, people who have a car will easily travel to any places at any times. My story as a student is a compelling example of this. My university is quite far from my home so I often went to university by bus. Because there were not any routes going straight to my university, I had to take two buses to get to university which took me a lot of time instead of twenty minutes travelling by car. Moreover, in order not to miss the bus, I had to wake up very early in the morning which made me uncomfortable. I am sure that people will buy a car as soon as possible because of its convenience.

Secondly, some opponents may argue that cars have several bad impacts on environment because of its emission; therefore, people will stop using car in the future. However, the reality could be different. Nowadays, petrol which is the main fuel of car is going to deplete. Beside that, people tend to gain an awareness of environmental issues such as air pollution; therefore, car manufacturers are gradually changing to use others source of energy. Nowadays, due to enhancement of technology, many cars are prone to use electricity which is cleaner than petrol. In addition, the car users also save money when using electric car because the price of the petrol is rising dramatically. I strongly believe that barriers preventing people from using car will be no longer exist.

In conclusion, I disagree that the number of cars would drop in the next twenty years. This is because cars bring many advantages to the users and the negative influence of car on environment will not be considerable.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2024-08-25	pezhmanlamei	73	view
2023-12-13	jimHsu	76	view
2023-12-07	butterflyluo	80	view
2023-12-07	butterflyluo	66	view
2023-12-07	butterflyluo	66	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user Tran Cat Su :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[4]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun equipment seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much modern equipment', 'a good deal of modern equipment'.
Suggestion: much modern equipment; a good deal of modern equipment
...ment of technology provides people with many modern equipment and car is one of the most important th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7602905569 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80266317678 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518159806295 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9742158392 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3636363636 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7727272727 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253134016223 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805605489309 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519400019913 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175027840677 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502626433085 0.0645574589148 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.