As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction.
To what extent do you agree with such a procedure?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Animal cloning has been going on for a few years now, and it has now opened the door to human cloning. While there are definite benefits to cloning for humanity in terms of providing new organs, I still feel it raises a number of ethical difficulties. And I will present my argument in this essay.
People are living far longer lives nowadays than in the past due to advances in medical technology and superior diets. However, this has led to a few problems that need to be mentioned. As usual, as people age, that means their organs will age or even be damaged due to external influences and need to be replaced. And the argument is that cloned people's spare parts can be used to replace the patient's organs. Right now, it is undeniable that there are insufficient organ donors to meet this need; thus, human cloning will solve this problem because there will always be a ready supply.
Nevertheless, many people are concerned about this, and with reason. For starters, there are numerous theological considerations against it. Cloning entails making other individuals and then murdering them for their organs, which might be considered murder. This is unquestionably a violation, according to religious writings. Furthermore, because these people will inevitably be human beings like us, questions concerning their rights will emerge. Moreover, if this cloning is carried out, it is unavoidably expensive and it can even spark a tidal wave of opposition from groups of individuals who disagree with it, generating unrest in society and possibly worse.
In conclusion, I oppose this cloning method owing to the ethical concerns and dilemmas it will create. Animal cloning is a great development that contributes many benefits to today's modern world, but it should stop there now to ensure that all components of society are protected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Koi | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | cleee | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | tung0303 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
- Although families have influence on a children s development factors outside the home play a bigger part in their lives nowadays To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 11
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 11
- Behaviour in schools is getting worse Explain the causes and effects of this problem and suggest some possible solutions 84
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree o 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, then, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07590759076 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74087590836 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600660066007 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7096389589 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169010595798 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564808587884 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518230920368 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929814387506 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550781829995 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.