In some countries, more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed their education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some positively regard living in a shared space with parents even though young graduates are financially independent. Although several positive sides of this practice can be witnessed, the negative ones seem to override.
Admittedly, supporting altogether is one prominent advantage of living under the same roof with parents when one reaches their junior adult age. This is due to the fact that sharing a living space with loving, familiar faces is equivalent to sharing things, including problems, sorrows and merriments. For example, thanks to the close distance, young adults can be right besides their parents whenever they need, specifically concerning the matter of health problems. Therefore, living together allows them to take care of their beloved better.
With the positive regard the aforementioned upside, continiously sharing space between the young adults and their families can be viewed from a negative perspective. The first worthmentioning reason is their privacy can be lost due to this trend. This can be explained by the fact that as an adult, they might want to keep themselves several level of privacy, something that are specially secret for them. For example, they may feel afraid whenever they throw a party or have a whitenight with their friends because unlike the young, the old prefer a quiet atmosphere in their own place. Futher and more prominently, the undermine of independent ability is attribute to…. To be more specific, parents tend to overtreat their sons and daughters, no matter how old are they, which accidentally put their reliance on parents. For instance, when a thing in the house get trouble, the young adults living with their families can get their parents help with fixing, while the seperate ones have to learn how to do themselves.
In conclusion, the benefits of keep living together with parents among the young adults pale in comparison with drawbacks.
- The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 89
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 11
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concert between 2010 and 2015
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 67
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by the fact that as an adult, they might want to keep themselves several level of...
^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun level seems to be countable; consider using: 'several levels'.
Suggestion: several levels
...lt, they might want to keep themselves several level of privacy, something that are speciall...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...own place. Futher and more prominently, the undermine of independent ability is attribute to…...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26470588235 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73957778285 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3625371686 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361983418169 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128760367028 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753618556236 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215330318371 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682673641512 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.