Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In the present world, we live in a democratic society where everyone has their own rights. Every people in our society has a duty placed on them to make their society more developed for future generations. In order to develop society, sometimes we have to emphasize the problems that may bring deleterious effects on future generations. The above prompt sets out that scandals are useful since they attract our attention in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. While I concede the fact that scandals are not that much of useful for dragging our attention, in my opinion, I mostly agree that scandals are useful to drag our attention on certain problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
To begin, Scandals are one form of exposure to the problems in front of society, which indicates where should we strike in order to dwindle the problems. Sometimes, people can not foresight the components of the problems but after any scandals, people can significantly understand the futility of the problem. For example, people thought the corruption in the city is only limited to the small private sectors but a recent scandal of receiving bribes involving many high-ranking government officials exposed that corruption is not only limited to private sectors but also deep-rooted in the government. The above example illustrates that sometimes scandals are more effective for bringing the problems into the light which a speaker or reformer could not have augured. Scandals are indications of society that all is not well. Sometimes scandals bring peoples’ attention to the problems and for that people can take necessary steps in order to mitigate the problem.
Furthermore, sometimes people are unable to judge the severity of a problem from their own perspective. Scandals are one of the prime indicators of the problem, after which the austerity of the problem is conspicuous to the people. For example, in the mid-1900s, everyone knew that opium is detrimental to people's health but the severity of the drug abuse was not patent to normal people. During the Vietnam War opium was accessible to every teenager in the major cities of the United States and after a major drug bust, people came to know the severity of the problem. The above example illustrates that scandals are meant to draw our attention to the bleak problems, which are embedded into our society and the predicaments to deal with them. On the other hand, some problems though predicted severe in nature by some of the reformers, could not measure the severity of the problems in the way scandals reveal them. Through scandals, people can take precaution to avert future catastrophes after knowing to what extent the problem affect our society.
However, one can not say all scandals are meant to draw our attention to the problems for the greater good. Sometimes people use scandals to harm certain people’s image and to spread misinformation. In the age of the internet propagating something is not a difficult job but people can not decide whether the information is true or false. Moreover, people do not take pain to verify whether the information is authentic or not. Often some people use this for their personal gain. Let's take an example, to promulgate their medicine certain company spreads that the rival companies cheap medicine cause heart disease which causes widespread protest to ban the rival company, resulting dearth of the availability of cheap medicine to the general population. This example illustrates that sometimes scandals are not good for the greater good furthermore it causes rampant misconceptions, thus impeding the progress of a society.
Despite these reasons, scandals sometimes brought unwarranted chaos has it merit such as spending widespread misinformation but such disadvantages are overshadowed by the potential advantages which are far more remunerative in nature. Thus emphasizing the problems which are brought about by the scandals after verifying the mendacity of the problem is advisable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets Specifically dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease In light of these findings Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership wi 58
- The following appeared in the Health section of the Greenhorne Gazette Motilac is a substance that occurs naturally in the human digestive tract Many consumers of dietary supplements containing motilac report significant easing of digestive discomfort aft 66
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 66
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as muc 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ms though predicted severe in nature by some of the reformers, could not measure the severi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...eople use this for their personal gain. Lets take an example, to promulgate their me...
^^^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'merits'?
Suggestion: merits
...etimes brought unwarranted chaos has it merit such as spending widespread misinformat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3387.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 652.0 442.535393258 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19478527607 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05314661074 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79701243095 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44018404908 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1075.5 704.065955056 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6964765122 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1481481481 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 20.0 5.13820224719 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235422262413 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742422078649 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764410620386 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146604738505 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675081615545 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ms though predicted severe in nature by some of the reformers, could not measure the severi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...eople use this for their personal gain. Lets take an example, to promulgate their me...
^^^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'merits'?
Suggestion: merits
...etimes brought unwarranted chaos has it merit such as spending widespread misinformat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3387.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 652.0 442.535393258 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19478527607 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05314661074 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79701243095 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44018404908 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1075.5 704.065955056 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6964765122 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1481481481 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 20.0 5.13820224719 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235422262413 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742422078649 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764410620386 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146604738505 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675081615545 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.