Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about aspects that make Spartacus an appealing hero. The author of the article feels that there is evidence to ascertain Spartacus's brave records. However, the lecturer disputes the claims made in the articles. Her position is that the life stories given rely on inaccuracy.
According to the reading, people appreciated Spartacus because his original goal was to return to his homeland taken over by Rome. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that returning to her homeland was not their only goal. To be more specific, Spartacus's group marched into the city and took away many valuables. As a result, their goal was to take revenge and get wealth.
Secondly, the passage suggests that people admire Spartacus. It goes on to say that Spartacus formed the ill-equipped team to defeat the highly trained Romans. However, the lecturer disputes this by saying that Spartacus was not a military genius. To elaborate, when the Roman military sent the larger and more well-trained troop than they had sent at the beginning of the fight. Spartacus's troop was defeated immediately.
Last but not least, the passage provides a theory that Spartacus sought to liberate slaves and command respect for human rights. Spartacus thus left a good impression on history. On the contrary, the professor contends that this is not true historical evidence. Furthermore, it was people in the anti-slavery movement that came up with this legend to inspire their members to fight for liberating slaves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | saharmnd | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | jjj33333 | 52 | view |
- Which of the following ways can help children behave better limiting types of television programs and movies spend more time talking with children supervising and monitoring 70
- Integrated Writing TPO 67 70
- TPO 58 86
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 52
- Which of the following ways can help children behave better limiting types of television programs and movies spend more time talking with children supervising and monitoring 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17131474104 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67504292844 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613545816733 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1646203521 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1111111111 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9444444444 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940298903786 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315734940205 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484304286214 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550538880953 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036638871659 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17131474104 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67504292844 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613545816733 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1646203521 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1111111111 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9444444444 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940298903786 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315734940205 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484304286214 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550538880953 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036638871659 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.