Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems, do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays environmental issues are of great concern to the public. Many strategies to curb the cause phenomenon that are introduced. Whether boosting price of fuel could alliviate impacts upon the environment is a controversial issue. I partly agree with this viewpoint as there are other factors that contribute to deterioration of ecosystems.
Apart from fuel, other elements such as industrialization and urbanisation are associated with degradation of nature. First, overpopulation in major cities require constant expansion of human's living habitat, which invades living areas of flora and fauna. Given that wild animal and vegetation lose their natural habitat, balance of biordiversity is placed at risk. Likewise, it is mandatory for human beings to ramp up manufacture in order to meet increasing demand of food, shelter, and other products and service. By doing so, companies leave enormous amount of carbon footprint in forms of chemical waste, emission that are main culprit of pollution to land, water bodies and air. Finally, shifts in people's lifestyle also have detrimental impacts upon the nature. Ways of life, which encourage convenience, instant gratification that favor plastic usage, fast fashions, and so forth exert a huge burden on environment. Thus, other components should be taken into account to address environment problems.
Admittedly, it is undeniable that change in fuel charge more or less have affects on evironment. If fuel price is increased, people tend to change to other types of vehicle or utilizing public transit. For instance, electric vehicle's operational price is much more affordable these days, which makes utilization of electric cars become more common. In addition to this, rise in fuel expenditure also motivates commuters to deploy public transportation system, therefore curb personal vehicles's emission, which causes environmental impacts. However, electric vehicles availability is yet rare and relevant public facilities are not adequate at the moment, therefore solely depending on fuel charge seem not sufficiently solving issues in environment.
In sum, human's activities are raised along with dire consequences on our planet. I believe that different measures should be applied rather than just changing fuel cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | kokomongcutee | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Today news plays an important role in people s lives and news media are more influential than ever before Why is it this case Is it positive or negative 88
- Many countries spend large amounts of money on preparing competitors in major world sporting events such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup Instead this money can be spent on encouraging children to take up sports at a young age To what extent do 84
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e cause phenomenon that are introduced. Whether boosting price of fuel could alliviate ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...nvironmental impacts. However, electric vehicles availability is yet rare and relevant p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed rather than just changing fuel cost.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67543859649 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01952227859 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672514619883 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2612658654 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.157894737 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14292608193 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375805296893 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302360720376 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801632068684 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181020922057 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.