The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period 15 years.
The statistical line chart illustrates how much waste being discharged by three different firms in 5-year intervals starting from 2000, measured in tones.
Overall, company a and b produced the most contaminants in the beginning and tended to fall over the 15-year period while company c saw waste output increased considerably.
As indicated in the chart, in 2000, company a produced 12 tonnes of waste while the other two firms produced about 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes of waste accordingly. In the next five years, the waste discharged by company b and c rose by around 2 tonnes whereas that of company a decreased by roughly 1 tonne.
Another considerable feature is the period from 2005 to 2015, company a cut waste production by nearly 4 tonnes and company b reduced its waste by around 7 tonnes. Conversely, company c witnessed an increase in waste production to over 9 tonnes while the amounts of waste from company a and b dropped significantly to approximately 8 tonnes and 3 tonnes accordingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-27 | nguyen thanh sang | 73 | view |
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugual between 1967 and 2007 73
- the world s population has been increasing significantly and people are running out of water food and fuel What consequences may overpopulation lead to What measures can be taken to fight overpopulation 84
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The graph below shows the total revenue of three pizza places in Vietnam The figures were taken in 2017 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, conversely, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91764705882 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99327967009 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 18.5980883128 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344529684155 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185936412489 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769047897128 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21726887482 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085162200356 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.