The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about how many tourists visited a particular Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
In general, total tourists rose considerably, and those staying on cruise ships increased in particular, overtaking those staying on the island itself, which underwent a more moderate increase.
The number of visitors staying on the island accounted for 0.75 million and stayed unchanged in 2011. It had a significant increase of 0.75 million tourists during the next three years, and stabilized in the following two years, at 1.5. After fluctuating, there was a slight rise in the number of visitors, at nearly 1.5 million. 0.25 million tourists who stayed on cruise ships were more in 2011 than in 2010, then it had a 0.25 million reduction in travelers numbers. During the next 5 years, cruise ship passengers rose steadily, surpassing the former figure midway through 2015 and reaching a peak in 2017 of 2 million.
Initially, it made up a total of 1 million tourists, and had a dramatic increase and peaked at 3.5 million passengers at the end of the period.
- To succeed in business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The bar chart shows the number of people working in four sports sectors in an Australian town in 2016 10
- The charts show survey results concerning why MBA graduates chose their degree and employer s reasons for hiring them 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 61
- With an increasing number of people eating fast food which if eating to regularly can cause health issues some people think that the only solution is ban it completely To what extent do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n island from 2010 to 2017. In general, total tourists rose considerably, and th...
^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llion. Initially, it made up a total of 1 million tourists, and had a dramatic i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02222222222 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74055054395 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.949446185 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142034430423 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830047143349 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104981439201 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118431098716 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128038547378 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.